Everything about Social Epistemology totally explained
Social epistemology is a broad set of approaches to the study of knowledge, all of which construe human knowledge as a collective achievement. Social epistemologists may be found working in many of the disciplines of the humanities and social sciences, most commonly in philosophy and sociology. In addition to marking a distinct movement in traditional, analytic
epistemology, social epistemology is associated with the interdisciplinary field of
Science and Technology Studies (STS).
The emergence of social epistemology
The term "social epistemology" was first used by the library scientists Margaret Egan and Jesse Shera in the 1950s.
Steven Shapin also used it in 1979. But its current sense began to emerge in the late 1980s. In 1987, the philosophical journal
Synthese published a special issue on social epistemology, which would include two authors that have since taken the discipline in two divergent directions:
Alvin Goldman and
Steve Fuller3. Fuller founded a journal called
Social Epistemology: a journal of knowledge, culture, and policy in 1987 and published his first book,
Social Epistemology, in 1988. Goldman's
Knowledge in a Social World came out in 1999; he's currently editor of the journal
Episteme: a journal of social epistemology, which was founded in 2004. While the aims and scope of these two journals overlap in many respects,
Social Epistemology is more open to science studies in addition to philosophy, while "the principal style [of
Episteme] is that of analytical philosophy".
The basic view of knowledge that motivated the emergence of social epistemology can be traced to the work of
Thomas Kuhn and
Michel Foucault, which gained in prominence at the end of the 1960s. Both brought historical concerns directly to bear on problems long associated with the philosophy of science. Perhaps the most notable issue here was the nature of
truth, which both Kuhn and Foucault described as a relative and contingent notion. On this background, ongoing work in the sociology of scientific knowledge (SSK) and the history and philosophy of science (HPS) was able to assert its epistemological consequences, leading most notably to the establishment of the Strong Programme at the University of Edinburgh. In terms of the two strands of social epistemology, Fuller is more sensitive and receptive to this historical trajectory (if not always in agreement) than Goldman, whose self-styled 'veritistic' social epistemology can be reasonably read as a systematic rejection of the more extreme claims associated with Kuhn and Foucault.
Present and future concerns
At this stage, both varieties of social epistemology remain largely "academic" or "theoretical" projects. But both emphasise the social significance of knowledge and therefore the cultural value of social epistemology itself. Both journals, for example, welcome papers that include a policy dimension. More practical applications of social epistemology can be found in the areas of
library science,
academic publishing and
knowledge policy.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Social Epistemology'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://social_epistemology.totallyexplained.com">Social epistemology Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
